Macbeth :: essays research papers

Macbeth Throughout the play, there are several occasions which may either be interpreted as manipulation of Macbeth’s character, or more dramatically as prophecies of his inevitable destiny. The most important of these elements are the supernatural witches. When Macbeth first meets the Witches (I.iii.) – seemingly by accident – they call him titles which have not yet been bestowed upon him. It is unclear whether the Witches plant the idea of earning these titles by foul play to Macbeth’s head, or whether it is a prophecy of future. Either way, their words eventually become reality. The further encounters with the Weyward Sisters and Hecate strengthens the idea of a preset destiny. The three apparitions summoned by the witches (IV.i.) and the prophecies that go together with them are all visions of the future. Unfortunaly for Macbeth he manages to read these manifestations of his destiny all wrong. Another important ’fatal’ element for Macbeth is Lady Macbeth. She is also heavily manipulating Macbeth (II.ii.), although she does not have the supernatural qualities of the Witches. She is clearly a woman driven by an infinite lust for power. However, the only way for her to fulfill her personal agenda is through her husband, Macbeth. Lady Macbeth’s character can be easily interpreted as a manifestation of the darker side of the human mind, an instrument between Macbeth and the realization of his inevitable destiny. When Macbeth has become King and felt power, he doesn't want to give it up. At first he wasn't at peace because he wanted the throne, but hesitated to carry out the murder. Now that he has the throne, he loses his peace with the prospect of losing the crown. His only choice now is to kill Banquo and Fleance. He is trying to work against prophecy – the third apparition – something he never learns not to do. While Macbeth carries out his dark deeds, he becomes a somewhat different person; he no longer possesses control over his destiny. His head becomes filled with images of murder, ghosts and other signs of a disturbed mind. The vision of the dagger (II.i.) is the earliest example of the duality and unstability of his character. Macbeth’s mind is contemplating the murder of Duncan, but he clearly hasn’t come to terms with it. After he has carried out the murder, Macbeth is able to keep a mask of innocence. When he has the doubtful Banquo murdered, and his ghost appears to haunt him

Changing a Qualitative Research Into a Quantitative Study Essay

Fry and her colleagues undertook a qualitative research to develop a moral distress model in military nursing. Using the same problem statement, literature analysis and background information, this paper aims at converting the qualitative study carried out by Fry and her colleagues into a quantitative study. The study entails setting different research questions and collecting data that aims at addressing these questions. The process proceeds by a review background information and the problem statement. The final state of the process is formulating a new quantitative study question. Qualitative research problem Moral distress is a critical concern in military nursing considering the harsh and complex environments under which military nurses operate in. Literature has established a conceptualised model of moral distress, which starts with initial moral distress symptoms that leads to reactive distress behaviour which results from the effects of the former. There are various factors that cause the occurrence of moral distress in nursing. Considering the environmental differences of military and civilian nursing practice, it is evident that the prevalence of moral distress varies. Quantitative research purpose The main objective of this quantitative study is to contribute to the knowledge base about military nursing moral distress. The knowledge drawn from the research findings will be informative in designing conceptual models of moral distress in military nursing and developing policies for expediting the problem. Quantitative research question The qualitative research question was: Do military nurses experience the dimensions of the conceptualised moral distress described in the problem statement? In response to this question, Fry and her colleagues established four guiding research objectives. They include identification of moral distress experience among the United States Nurse Corps officers; construction of a moral distress model for moral distress experience among military nurses; development of a valid and reliable tool to measure moral distress in military nursing and the identification of the moral distress dimensions among military nurses. The new research question is: What is the prevalence of moral distress in military nursing? The research objectives associated with the aforementioned quantitative question include: (1) To establish the prevalence of moral distress among the Nurse Corps officers of the United States who have ever participated in the military crisis and (2) to establish the percentage of military nurses to develop reactive moral distress behaviour after suffering initial moral distress. Quantitative research sample The qualitative research sample comprised of 13 United States Army Nurse Corps Officers who have ever been deployed in military crisis zones from 1980 and latter. Seven of the thirteen nurses who took part in the research study were males. Six of them had been deployed in Bosnia, Three in Vietnam and four in the Persian Gulf War. The new study sample will include the retired and current United States military nurses who have ever been deployed in the military crisis zones. The large sample size is essential in identifying an inclusive sample representative of 1500 participants to give a higher validity and reliability of the research findings. Participants will be recruited through random selection of nurses who have ever been deployed to military crisis zones. The use of randomised selection of participants improves the validity of the overall results. Qualitative research limitations The first limitation as seen from the study is the use of snowballing sampling which reduces the validity of the overall findings. The second weakness of qualitative study relates to the sample’s small size. The final research findings of qualitative research lack generalizability due to the small sample size. The third weakness of qualitative research is the long time it takes to gather research data through interviews. The fourth eakness is the difficulties encountered in the analysis of the research data. It is not practical to apply statistical methods and tools in the analysis of qualitative study data. The limitations of the new quantitative research findings include: (1) the logical difficulties of getting a large sample size of 1500 participants; (2) the cost implications. It is costly to carry out a research involving such a large sample size. The third limitation is the inability of quantitative study to capture real sample dynamics that are guaranteed by structured interviews (Creswell, 1999). Qualitative Informed Consent and use of IRB The given study satisfied all the ethical research considerations. The researchers obtained the participant’s informed consent and also upheld the duty of confidentiality. The institutional review boards’ approvals were also sought before commencement of the research (Fry et al. , 2002). In the quantitative research study, ethical research considerations involved obtaining research approval from relevant institutional review boards. The research preamble instructions outlined the duty of confidentiality owed by the researcher to the participants. Participation in the phenomenal research study was also voluntary upon acquisition the consents of the participants. Qualitative Research Design and Philosophical Connectedness (underpinnings) The research design has two phases. The first phase entailed a review of the current literature to establish a conceptual moral distress model. The second phase entailed a structured interview with 13 participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria to collect the required research data. The final research findings were used in validation of the conceptualized moral distress model. The quantitative research employs a phenomenological study of the experiences of the United States military nurses in military crisis deployments. The study will seek to obtain the individual encounters with situations that caused them moral distresses. The research study will also seek to establish the prevalence of reactive moral distress behaviour among the participants that suffered initial moral distresses. The research design will employ a questionnaire for data collection. The questionnaire will contain both open and closed ended questions to collect specific responses from participants and general open-ended views from participants. Quantitative Rigor of the Study Rigor is essential in quantitative research study. It raises the overall significance the research. Reliability and validity are the key dimensions of quantitative research’s rigor (Cohen, Manion, & Morrison, 2007). The use of a large sample size and probabilistic recruitment of the research participants increases the external validity of the overall research findings. The researcher should also avoid the research bias in the collection and analysis of the findings to increase the generalizability of the findings. Reliability is the measure of consistency of the research findings. It can be increased by applying similar statistical tools of analysis the results. SPSS is an accurate tool for statistical analysis of quantitative research findings using a uniform degree of freedom. The use of a self-administered questionnaire helps in maintaining anonymity, which give participants the freedom of expressing their genuine views. This is essential in reducing bias and increasing the overall validity and reliability of the research findings. The researcher should admit only completed questionnaires for final research analysis to ensure high validity and reliability of the study findings. This underpins the essence of recruiting a higher number of research participants to guarantee a high number of valid responses from the participants for analysis. Advantages of Qualitative research The main advantages of qualitative research include: (1) In-depth research of a phenomena through structured interviews and observation; (2) Flexibility of the research method to accommodate undefined variables; (3) Ability to capture the whole research information and scenes through tape recording and (4) it allows the researcher to note only relevant responses for analysis (Rubin & Babbie, 2009). Disadvantages of qualitative research The major advantages of qualitative study include: (1) subjectivity of the research findings; (2) its vulnerability to researcher’s bias; (3) It requires a lot of labour and resources; (4) limited replicability and generalizability of the research findings and (5) the difficulties encountered in analysing qualitative research data. It is laborious and time consuming (Rubin & Babbie, 2009). Advantages of quantitative research study The main strengths of quantitative research include: (1) the ease of data analysis using statistical tools; (2) the ease of statistical analysis of quantitative data makes it effective in testing hypotheses and (3) the ability to accommodate large sample sizes that increases validity and reliability of the findings. Disadvantages of quantitative research The first weakness of quantitative research is the ignorance of the research context. The second is the connectedness of the research validity with large sample sizes. It can be difficult and expensive to get a large sample size. The third weakness is the high probability of getting unreliable responses from anonymous participants.

Redi: Scientific Method and Heather Ramirez Page

1. State a possible hypothesis for Redi’s experiment. -Hypothesis for Redi’s experiment is that maggots come from larva of flies and that the meats only serve as food for the developing insects. 2. Which of the three jars in Redi’s experiment would be considered the control and why? -The jar that was left uncovered in the experiment would be considered the control because this jar represented the meat as it would normally be found with the maggots attached. 3. Give a brief explanation of Redi’s experimental procedure. Redi preformed an experiment to prove where maggots came from. He took three jars and put a piece of meat in each jar. Jar 1 was left uncovered, jar 2 was covered with netting (gauze), and jar 3 was sealed from the outside. In jar 1, maggots were found on the meat and there were flies flying around that had laid eggs on the meat. Jar 2 was found to have maggots on the netting of the jar, because the flies had begun to lay their eggs. Jar 3 ha d not developed any maggots on the meat, which proved that living things are not spontaneously generated. Heather Ramirez Page 2 4. Why would the experiments run by Redi, Spallanzani, and Pasteur be considered as a possible basis for a theory? -Redi, Spallanzani, and Pasteur all used similar experiments to prove that living things are not spontaneously generated and through their experiments they were able to support their hypothesis with scientific reasoning. The experiments preformed were considered valid because of the reproducible outcome in each study. 5-6. What were the possible conclusions reached from Spallanzani’s experiment? Why were his conclusions not accepted? -After boiling the broths no bacteria was present. Although his experiment was successful, his conclusions were not accepted because he had deprived the sealed flasks of air by melting their glass necks and it was thought that air was necessary for spontaneous generation to occur. The experiment was also contradicting because, if the flasks neck became cracked the broth would then obtain a rapid growth of microorganisms. 7. Why would Aristotle’s thoughts on spontaneous generation be considered nonscientific reasoning? -Aristotle believed that living things arose and always had arisen from lifeless matter. This would be considered nonscientific reasoning because these were just his thoughts and beliefs, not something that was scientifically tested. For something to be classified as scientific reasoning it would require an actual scientific research method, such as an Heather Ramirez Page 3 xperiment to first predict and then test the hypothesis to ultimately come to a conclusion based on the results from the experiment. 8. How did Pasteur modify Spallanzani’s experiment in order to provide further experimentation on spontaneous generation? -Pasteur used swan-necked flasks which allowed air into the flasks but the route was so convoluted that any particles drifting in from the air would settle out in the folds of the glass before reaching the broth. His flasks were open to the air but did no t support bacterial growth like Spallanzani’s flasks did. This method had rejected the possibility of spontaneous generation because the broth in the swan-necked flasks remained clear which concluded the previous tests done by Spallazani and Needham were not accurate. The normal flasks allowed bacteria to drift into the broth causing cloudy bacterial soups and had thickened the rich nutrients due to the bacteria multiplying. 9-10. In Order for experimental results to be accepted, the results must be reproducible. Why did Tyndall have problems reproducing Pasteur’s work and how did he solve the problem? Pasteur and others scientist were using different types of broths. (Pasteur only used broths made with sugar or yeast extract, and the other scientist were using broths made from hay) As a result, Tyndall found that these different types of broths required different boiling times to be sterilized. He found that certain microorganisms can exist in heat- Heather Ramirez Page 4 resistant forms, which are called endospores. Once this confl icting data was brought to light Tyndall was able to reproduce Pasteur’s experiment and prove him to be correct.

William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essays

William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essays William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essay William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essay Essay Topic: Julius Caesar Julius Caesar shows that people respond to power and glorification in different ways. Discuss. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar has a strong focal point on the response that assorted characters display to power and glorification. and how and why this response may change between them. Shakspere shows contrast in response to high quality to a great extent throughout the text. and explains that people’s revenge to it will ever differ. Where focal point for some. prevarications in the attainment and retention of power. others prefer a position of conserving Rome’s traditional authorities system. Contrast is seen strongly in character’s positions of Caesar’s decease. and besides in their sentiments of the predating events and Caesar’s addition of power. Despite these differing factors. all characters are portrayed to hold some sort of lecherousness for power. and purpose to derive authorization over citizens. These qualities are seen most stron gly across the supporters of the narrative: Caesar. Brutus. Cassius and Antony. Throughout the text. characters claim to oppose Caesar’s regulation for the pure ground of conserving the traditions of Rome’s authorities and heritage. but some developments strongly suggest the subterranean motivation of desire for power. The thought of â€Å" [ Rome’s ] broad walk [ embracing ] but merely one man† is dashing to Cassius. and he peculiarly portrays this throughout the drama. joined by Brutus. claiming that the blackwash of Caesar brings them â€Å"peace. freedom and liberty† . However. opposing this. Cassius provinces that he â€Å"was born every bit free as Caesar† and therefore is every bit meriting of power. connoting enviousness or resent toward the omnipotence Caesar achieves. Brutus stands by his purpose. decidedly meaning his portion with the plotters was â€Å"not that [ he ] loved Caesar less. but that [ he ] loved Rome more† . Brutus feels as though Caesar’s leading would negatively impact Rome and the good that Roman citizens have achieved. In contrast. Caesar and Antony both claim that Caesar’s regulation would be positive for Rome. Antony. as a strong protagonist. bases by Caesar and claims that Caesar does hold love for Rome. and would neer hold put the destiny of Rome in danger. Although he states this verbally much later in the drama. this is seen through Antony showing the Crown to Caesar upon his return to Rome from get the better ofing Pompey. Caesar himself believes that he is worthy to govern Rome. and wants to derive the trust and support of the Roman citizens. He begins to make this by rejecting the Crown when offered it. cognizing that many people would be unhappy with the credence of the Crown. and the subsequent stoping of the Republic. nevertheless it is apparent that his purposes may alter. When told to go to the Senate as the Crown is traveling to be offered to him once more. Caesar thirstily takes this chance. connoting his desire. Although he is â€Å"for the good of Rome† . he still has purpose to travel against the system of authorities in topographic point for omnipotence. Upon Caesar’s blackwash. the sentiments of many characters is shown to vary strongly. and this becomes progressively apparent as the text continues. Antony immediately ridicules the logical thinking of the blackwash. stating that he was non â€Å"ambitious† in the sense of deriving domination. as he was â€Å"thrice presented†¦a kingly crown† and â€Å"he did thrice refuse† . presenting his said â€Å"ambition† to be questionable. This is a mark of his repose toward power and those who have acquired it. contrasting with Cassius. who feels it is boisterous for Caesar to â€Å"bestride the narrow world† as the exclusive leader of Rome. and sees that this is just ground for Caesar’s blackwash. Cassius here appears to hold desire for power. and to utilize Toward the decision of the text. upon taking their ain lives. both Cassius and Brutus officially verbalise their positions of their purposes in Caesar’s blackwash. but they be sides have differing responses to what they have done. While Brutus seems to demo sorrow over killing Caesar. Cassius seems acrimonious about Caesar’s decease. with the claim that Caesar was â€Å"revenged† by Cassius’ self-destruction. as if to entitle him with the incrimination for his decease. Brutus seems sorry. as he states that Caesar was killed â€Å"with half so good a will† than himself. stating that he is more deserving of decease. and offering Caesar to â€Å"be still† in his decease. The protagonists’ positions on the blackwash thrust frontward the strong aspiration they show to achieve power themselves. and their feelings toward those who are in power. Opinions of Caesar’s success are to a great extent contrasted between the story’s protagonists to underscore how they see glory and fame. peculiarly comparing Antony and Cassius. Their positions oppose each other. with Antony strongly back uping the success and rise of Caesar. where Brutus claims that Romans â€Å"as underlings† should be endeavoring to travel against Caesar’s reign. and alter the manner Caesar is taking. Antony focuses strongly on Caesar’s leading as a positive portion of Rome’s society. and the love Caesar displays to the people. He signifies this by â€Å"thrice [ showing Caesar ] a kingly crown† . and stating the people of Rome of Caesar’s great efforts. Although the chief contrast lies here. both Brutus and Caesar himself have their ain sentiments. both of which slightly contrast with the positions of Antony and Cassius. Brutus responds to Caesar’s reign by oppugning Caesar’s character. and chew overing the thought that Caesar’s coronating â€Å"might alteration his nature† . implying that he may go a worse individual because of it. Caesar himself has a positive response to his addition of power. but shortly it seems as though power shortly goes to his caput. and he begins to do roseola determinations that regard the people of Rome more harshly. Each supporter has a different attack to Caesar’s reign. and each character responds to his rise in their ain single mode. The segregation of sentiments in respects to power and glorification is contrasted in itself by each character’s shared desire for power. This component of the text is seen at some times more strongly than others. as characters portray their emotions through private and public ideas otherwise. and express more in what they think in private. Cassius. although apparently â€Å"for the good of Rome† is described by Caesar to â€Å" [ have ] a mean and hungry look† . implying that he has desire for power. which is besides seen through the deduction of his resentment and enviousness of Caesar when he claims that he was â€Å"born every bit free as [ him ] † . Brutus is likely the least power hungry of characters. although he still does want power and luck. as he claims he â€Å"would non hold it so† with Caesar a swayer. yet he still â€Å" [ loves ] him well† . Antony seems to desire the attending and regard of people in the assembly of Roman citizens more than legitimate power over them. and uses his public speech production and persuasive accomplishments to accomplish this. with his repeat of the phrase: â€Å"Brutus is an honorable man† to condescend and degrade him. Caesar is the most power hungry of them all. although does non look it in his rejection of the Crown. He wants â€Å"men about [ him ] who are fat† in the sense of cognition. and content with the power they have. as he does non desire anyone stealing his power from him. Each supporter portions this lecherousness for glorification and prestigiousness. and each in a sense additions some victory throughout the text. Although there is a shared desire to obtain and keep power. the characters Shakespeare portrays in Julius Caesar depict the differing responses that many characters can hold to the power they have. or the power those around them have decidedly. They may portion some facets of their reactions. or portray it in a similar sense. but overall. the characters positions and sentiments vary to a great extent throughout the text. Each facet of the response characters have is seen in all four. but in each it opposes. as seen through the picks and contemplations that characters portray.

Free Essays on Crucifixion As A Means Of Execution

Crucifixion as a Method of Execution I. The Definition of Crucifixion II. Symbolism of the Cross III. History of Crucifixion A. Persia and Alexander B. Roman Empire C. Isalmic World D. Medieval Japan E. Mesoamerica F. Modern Crucifixions IV. The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ A. The Trial of Jesus Christ B. The Crucifixion C. The Resurrection Table of Contents Crucifixion The definition 004 The Cross Symbolism of the Cross 005 History of Crucifixion Persia and Alexander 006 Roman Empire Islamic World 007 Medieval Japan Mesoamerica 008 Modern Crucifixions The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ The Trial 009 The Crucifixion The Resurrection 015 Crucifixion is the execution of a criminal by nailing or binding to a cross. It was a common form of capital punishment from the 6th century bc to the 4th century ad, especially among the Persians, Egyptians, Carthaginians, and Romans. Crucifixion was hardly (if ever) performed for ritual or symbolic reasons; usually, its purpose was only to provide a particularly painful, gruesome, and public death, using whatever means was most expedient for that goal. The Romans used crucifixion for slaves and criminals but never for their own citizens. Roman law provided that the criminal be scourged before being put to death; the accused also had to carry either the entire cross or, more commonly, the crossbeam from the place of scourging to the place of execution. The practice was abolished in 337 by Constantine the Great out of respect for Jesus Christ, who died on the cross. The crucifixion of Christ between two thieves is recorded in the New Testament by all four evangelists (see Matthew 27:33-44; Mark 15:22-32; Luke 23:33-43; John 19:17-30). The significance of the crucifixion has been a subject for theological discussion throughout church history. (Microsoft E... Free Essays on Crucifixion As A Means Of Execution Free Essays on Crucifixion As A Means Of Execution Crucifixion as a Method of Execution I. The Definition of Crucifixion II. Symbolism of the Cross III. History of Crucifixion A. Persia and Alexander B. Roman Empire C. Isalmic World D. Medieval Japan E. Mesoamerica F. Modern Crucifixions IV. The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ A. The Trial of Jesus Christ B. The Crucifixion C. The Resurrection Table of Contents Crucifixion The definition 004 The Cross Symbolism of the Cross 005 History of Crucifixion Persia and Alexander 006 Roman Empire Islamic World 007 Medieval Japan Mesoamerica 008 Modern Crucifixions The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ The Trial 009 The Crucifixion The Resurrection 015 Crucifixion is the execution of a criminal by nailing or binding to a cross. It was a common form of capital punishment from the 6th century bc to the 4th century ad, especially among the Persians, Egyptians, Carthaginians, and Romans. Crucifixion was hardly (if ever) performed for ritual or symbolic reasons; usually, its purpose was only to provide a particularly painful, gruesome, and public death, using whatever means was most expedient for that goal. The Romans used crucifixion for slaves and criminals but never for their own citizens. Roman law provided that the criminal be scourged before being put to death; the accused also had to carry either the entire cross or, more commonly, the crossbeam from the place of scourging to the place of execution. The practice was abolished in 337 by Constantine the Great out of respect for Jesus Christ, who died on the cross. The crucifixion of Christ between two thieves is recorded in the New Testament by all four evangelists (see Matthew 27:33-44; Mark 15:22-32; Luke 23:33-43; John 19:17-30). The significance of the crucifixion has been a subject for theological discussion throughout church history. (Microsoft E...

The Ides of March

The Ides of March The Ides of March (Eidus Martiae in Latin) is a day on the traditional Roman calendar that corresponds to the date of March 15th on our current calendar. Today the date is commonly associated with bad luck, a reputation that it earned at the end of the reign of the Roman emperor Julius Caesar (100–43 BCE). A Warning In 44 BCE, Julius Caesars rule in Rome was in trouble. Caesar was a demagogue, a ruler who set his own rules, frequently bypassing the Senate to do what he liked, and finding supporters in the Roman proletariat and his soldiers. The Senate made Caesar dictator for life in February of that year, but in truth, he had been the military dictator governing Rome from the field since 49. When he returned to Rome, he kept his stringent rules. According to the Roman historian Suetonius (690–130 CE), the haruspex (seeress) Spurinna warned Caesar in mid-February 44, telling him that the next 30 days were to be fraught with peril, but the danger would end on the Ides of March. When they met on the Ides of March Caesar said you are aware, surely, that the Ides of March have passed and Spurinna responded, surely you realize that they have not yet passed? CAESAR to SOOTHSAYER: The Ides of March are come. SOOTHSAYER (softly): Ay, Caesar, but not gone. - Shakespeares Julius Caesar What Are Ides, Anyway? The Roman calendar did not number days of an individual month sequentially from first to last as is done today. Rather than sequential numbering, the Romans counted backward from three specific points in the lunar month, depending on the length of the month. Those points were the Nones (which fell on the fifth in months with 30 days and the seventh day in 31-day months), the Ides (the thirteenth or the fifteenth), and the Kalends (the first of the following month). The Ides typically occurred near a month’s midpoint; specifically on the fifteenth in March. The length of the month was determined by the number of days in the moons cycle: Marchs Ides date was determined by the full moon. Why Caesar Had to Die There were said to be several plots to kill Caesar and for a multitude of reasons. According to Suetonius, the Sybelline Oracle had declared that Parthia could only be conquered by a Roman king, and the Roman consul Marcus Aurelius Cotta was planning to call for Caesar to be named king in mid-March. The senators feared Caesars power, and that he might overthrow the Senate in favor of general tyranny. Brutus and Cassius, the main conspirators in the plot to kill Caesar, were magistrates of the Senate, and as they would not be allowed to either oppose the crowning of Caesar nor remain silent, they had to kill him. A Historical Moment Before Caesar went to the theater of Pompey to attend the Senate meeting, he had been given advice not to go, but he did not listen. Doctors had advised him not to go for medical reasons, and his wife, Calpurnia, also did not want him to go based off of troubling dreams that she had. On the Ides of March, 44 BCE, Caesar was murdered, stabbed to death by the conspirators near the Theatre of Pompey where the Senate was meeting. Caesar’s assassination transformed Roman history, as it was a central event in marking the transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. His assassination resulted directly in the Liberator’s Civil War, which was waged to avenge his death. With Caesar gone, the Roman Republic did not last long and was eventually replaced by the Roman Empire, which lasted approximately 500 years. The initial two centuries of the Roman Empire’s existence were known to be a time of supreme and unprecedented stability and prosperity. The time period came to be known as â€Å"Roman Peace.† Anna Perenna Festival Before it became notorious as the day of Caesars death, the Ides of March was a day of religious observations on the Roman calendar, and it is possible that the conspirators chose the date because of that. In ancient Rome, a festival for Anna Perenna (Annae festum geniale Pennae) was held on the Ides of March. Perenna was a Roman deity of the circle of the year. Her festival originally concluded the ceremonies of the new year, as March was the first month of the year on the original Roman calendar. Thus, Perenna’s festival was celebrated enthusiastically by the common people with picnics, eating, drinking, games, and general revelry. The Anna Perenna festival was, like many Roman carnivals, a time when celebrants could subvert traditional power relations between social classes and gender roles  when people were allowed to speak freely about sex and politics. Most importantly the conspirators could count on the absence of at least a part of the proletariat from the center of the city, while others would be watching the gladiators games. Sources Balsdon, J. P. V. D. The Ides of March. Historia: Zeitschrift Fà ¼r Alte Geschichte 7.1 (1958): 80-94. Print.Horsfall N. 1974. The Ides of March: Some New Problems. Greece Rome 21(2):191-199.Horsfall, Nicholas. The Ides of March: Some New Problems. Greece Rome 21.2 (1974): 191-99. Print.Newlands, Carole. Transgressive Acts: Ovids Treatment of the Ides of March. Classical Philology 91.4 (1996): 320-38. Print.Ramsey, John T. Beware the Ides of March!: An Astrological Prediction? The Classical Quarterly 50.2 (2000): 440-54. Print.

Coptic Egyptian and Christian Nubian painting Essay

Coptic Egyptian and Christian Nubian painting - Essay Example The essay "Coptic Egyptian and Christian Nubian painting" compares Egyptian painting with Nubian painting and explores what do their themes tell us about the socio-economic life of these societies and their ideological outlook. A study of the region’s history and artifacts reveal its encounters with Pharaoh’s Egypt, the Nubian Kingdoms’ apparent transformation into Christendom, and the formation of Muslim and Arab identities in the more recent past. Scholars dedicated to the study of Egyptian politics and history have quite a lot to deduce from paintings found in Nubian and Coptic churches of ancient times. The sections that follow are dedicated to the analysis of Coptic and Nubian Christian pictures and culture during the period between 500 and 1000 AD. Nubia refers to the region that lies in northern Sudan and south of Egypt along the Nile. With quarter of its territory lying in Egypt, and most of itself lying in Sudan, ancient Nubia was formally a self-governi ng kingdom. In 373 AD, Bishop Athanasius consecrated as bishop of Philae Marcus in a show that marked the penetration of Christianity in the fourth century. In 545, a Monophysite priest, Julian, is recorded to have led to the King’s conversion together with several of his noblemen. In the same year, other records suggest, the Makuria Kingdom was converted to Catholism by Byzantine missionaries. As time went by, Arab traders introduced Islam to Nubia which slowly supplanted Christianity. It is noted that whereas there could have been a bishop.